Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utkirbek Kakhorov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Utkirbek Kakhorov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was tagged as G11 and indicated to be cross wiki spam (cc @Kagansky:), and while I don't think it's promotional enough to be deleted via that route there's no claim to creative notability. His work does not seem significant enough roles wise to be notable. While I do not read Russian or Uzbek, the sources have RS challenges and do not appear to be in depth enough to meet GNG. Star Mississippi 22:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Uzbekistan. Star Mississippi 22:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All information in the article is backed up by reliable sources like news sites, film databases, blogs etc. Morover, recent work of the persona in the article has been discussed widely on the web. The article keeps its notability. I request to double check before deletion. Please address the references section of the article to check the sources. More references have been inserted and the overall quality of the article has been updated. Thank you for your time and effort. This helped the article to be better than before. Film contributor (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay your attention: The author created an article about himself. The article contains practically no independent authoritative sources. One authoritative source is indicated, which provides a discussion about the series, and not about the subject. Article does not correspond to WP:NACTOR. The topic and subject of the article is not encyclopedically significant. None of these sources has detailed coverage of the subject. — Kagansky (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:NWRITER or WP:ANYBIO. I couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. Of the sources cited in the article, most are not WP:RS and none of the few that might be reliable have significant coverage of Kakhorov. WP:TOOSOON. Schazjmd (talk) 14:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.