Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uthhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uthhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm concerned that this might not pass WP:NORG, in particular WP:ORGCRIT, which requires significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. In a WP:BEFORE search, I found two sources, Patna Daily and Techstory where there is an actual author and it isn't just a blatant press release written by Utthan themselves. I'm still not convinced that this meets the high bar at NORG and even the two links above look like they might be promotional/sponsored.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://in.news.yahoo.com/noble-initiative-empower-artisans-eliminating-134524980.html	Clearly a press release		It's all written by the organisation so does not contribute to SIGCOV	✘ No
https://goldeneraroyalgroup.com/	?	?	Passing mention	✘ No
https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/features/uthhan-connecting-profits-with-artisans	Another press release		We need more than press releases	✘ No
http://bizodisha.com/2019/11/uthhan-helps-hapless-artisan-in-odisha-to-survive/		?	Another part of their promo	✘ No
https://indianstartupnews.com/uthhan-first-marketplace-for-india-artisans-to-sell-their-handicrafts-to-end-customers		?	The link is dead but the title is exactly the same as the other press releases	✘ No
https://developergang.com/uthhan-a-mobile-app-for-indian-artisans/		?	Promo for their app does not make it notable	✘ No
https://uthhanecom.gergstore.com/			This is a link to their shop	✘ No
https://www.facebook.com/uthhan.org/posts/1958291987634575			This is their Facebook page	✘ No
https://uthhanecom.gergstore.com/Uthhan_Crafts_Mela_2020			This is their own shop	✘ No
https://www.facebook.com/uthhan.org/posts/2096823587114747			This is their Facebook page	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is applied for Deleting for adding external links which are linking to promotional contents. Now, the admin has removed the promotional/sponsored links to any other external links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VENKATESHafx (talk • contribs) 12:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got any independent, reliable sources to show that this passes WP:NORG? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2019-11 ✍️ create

• Delete: does not seem to have reliable sourcing, nor is it clear if this is actually an ORG. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Aside from the Free Press Journal Q&A with the founder, my searches found a Patna Daily article about a recent campaign [1] but it is marked as a reader contribution. I am not seeing the coverage needed to demonstrate that this project has attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There are not enough reliable sources which meets WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 16:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.