Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urmila Srabonti Kar

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 09:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Urmila Srabonti Kar

Urmila Srabonti Kar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress. unreliable sources and no notable works or awards whatsoever. Mar11 (talk) 07:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very notable actress, you search in bengali "ঊর্মিলা শাবন্তী কর" Makhamakhi (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It's true that there are no awards, and the notability of roles/shows is difficult to evaluate, but I replaced the unreliable celebs website with a reliable newspaper article, and added some potential sources to a "further reading" section. The only source of substantial depth is [1], but WP:BASIC allows multiple sources that individually are not deep to be combined in order to demonstrate notability. For that purpose there are also these 33 subscription hits on HighBeam. I feel that's enough without analyzing the 67 Google News results in Bengali. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep--Not too convinced about encyclopedic notability but seems a borderline-pass.~ Winged BladesGodric 12:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.