Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uri de Beer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uri de Beer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

dubious notability. Can find virtually no coverage by reliable sources, created by an SPA/paid editor with an interest in promoting this individual FASTILY 02:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Architecture, and Israel. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:29, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A BEFORE search reveals user-submitted content, native advertising, social media, database listings, and the like. The article seems to be WP:PROMO and I don't think the artist meets our criteria for notability per WP:GNG. When an artist claims they are "famous" on their own website likely is not. The conflict of interest/paid editing is troubling as well. Netherzone (talk) 21:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient coverage to meet notability guidelines. MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have removed the puff and have added a few references. gidonb (talk) 10:35, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.