Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upstar (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. We have consensus that this company is not notable. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upstar

Upstar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, lacking significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. The article text acknowledges as much, noting that the company has "low brand recognition", ie. is not notable. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 21:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.