Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper-atmosphere impact

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Moving to RFD Primefac (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Upper-atmosphere impact

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of a bazillion links that Fmadd is inserting into Wikipedia with little necessity. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 13:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking around I find many places talk about upper atmosphere asteroid impact/ airburst. Isn't it nice how wikipedia can find highlight/find relationships between things beyond the original article? With bigger articles, isn't it nice to have a more direct contextual link? Don't links increase wikipedias value as a resource, giving the text more context (e.g. value as a tool for training AI, whatever). List_of_meteor_air_bursts [[upper atmosphere airburst] upper atmosphere impact

Fmadd (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be at WP:RFD instead of WP:AFD? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Close - yes it should. I have changed the target to the current subsection heading. Let it be considered at RfD if that is considered necessary: Noyster (talk), 13:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.