Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Martin Scorsese project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Martin Scorsese project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Love this idea on principle, but am unconvinced it actually exists. The first two sources linked to could easily refer to Stone's work in the Scorsese Netflix documentary Rolling Thunder Revue, while the third source which mentions Streep might easily be conflating Rolling Thunder Revue with The Laundromat, a Netflix film that stars Streep and Stone. At the very least, I believe this subject needs more notable sources that verifiably refer to this specific project before it should be allowed in the mainspace. NathanielTheBold (talk) 21:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rollidan (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:HAMMER....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per WP:NYF and WP:HAMMER. There's no title, we don't know who or what the film is about, when it might come out, etc. Even if reliable sources were added stating that such a project exists, it's hardly worthy of an article given so little information about it. [Belinrahs|^talk⁄ _edits] 03:04, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFF and was created by a known (and now blocked) sock. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL "Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content". --Pontificalibus 12:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Draft until we know more. It is the least destructive option and if nothing materializes in 6 months it gets deleted. Lightburst (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HAMMER, WP:SNOW, and WP:CRYSTAL. Bearian (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.