Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsacred Hearts
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 10:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsacred Hearts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:MUSIC notability guideline; article cites few to no third-party sources; label (Serious Business Records) has been deemed non-notable. Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per WP:MUSIC WP:N WP:RS WP:OR WP:VSCA. There are actually no third-party sources, only promo sites for the band, the label, and what looks like an internet station one of the guys is involved with. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per above comment. What does this article pass? - Rjd0060 05:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC, in that its record label is not even notable, they haven't had any charted hits, they've only released 1.5 EPs (not even a LP), and have no reliable, 3rd party sources as per WP:RS. Neranei (talk) 15:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: If you're feeling bolder than I, try prodding these related articles before I do. --Damian Yerrick (serious | business) 05:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.