Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unitrans RT742

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Unitrans. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unitrans RT742

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Individual vehicles do not need own page surely? Possibly merge with Unitrans? Tom the Tomato ^Talk Pending namechange to Aycliffe. 15:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Ex-London double deckers are common throughout the world. I doubt that individual buses are notable unless they have been made notable (in a film, or something newsworthy). I would suggest that the fleet of Unitrans red buses be merged into a single article from the main Unitrans article. e.g. Unitrans London bus fleet. Martin451 (talk) 22:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom, Non notable stuff that would be better merged to Unitrans -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.