Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States House of Representatives Republican Leader election, 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States House of Representatives Republican Leader election, 2006

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially redundant. The resignation and election are covered just fine in the articles of Tom DeLay and John Boehner, respectively. There is no need for a standalone article for an in-party election of the second-most-important job in the party. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 00:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 00:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 00:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We don't need articles on the election of every position. Number 5 7 11:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- covered other places, could possibly be mentioned in 109th United States Congress too, but I really don't feel its that important of an election.--Rusf10 (talk) 03:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with ~~109th United States Congress per Rusf10 - it kinda is an important election. Meets WP:GNG, but it will be better served in the context of that congress.~~ John Boehner ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 05:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it be better served in the context of John Boehner's rise to the Speakership. My bad.―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 05:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you check out his article, and DeLay's, it's fairly well covered in both, I think. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.