Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unistal Systems Pvt. Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. EpicTraveler, consider making a draft and seeking the input of other editors or using WP:AfC next time. A Train^talk 06:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unistal Systems Pvt. Ltd.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish any notability under WP:ORG and is written in the style of an advertisement throughout. Any clean up will require removing the vast majority of content (if not all). Vasemmistolainen (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nom is right on the money. Refs are entirely self-promotional. PROD territory.South Nashua (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had create this wikipedia page just for informative purpose and not for any promotion purpose. I had first created the same in the sandbox before getting it live on Wikipedia. But I am a beginner at Wikipedia, I will make the necessary changes so that it should comply with the Wikipedia policies. I would request the fellow members to give their valuable suggestion so that I can make the changes in the Wikipedia page as I have really worked hard to create this page and don't want to get it deleted. EpicTraveler (talk) 04:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the necessary changes as which complies with the Wikipedia policies. I would request the fellow admin to check the same and please guide me so that my hard work on sandbox doesn't go in vain.

Delete Regrettably, pages cannot be kept merely because someone spent time making them. They have to warrant their existence. Personally (despite your hard work) I fail to see how this company is noteworthy. It exists, it does its job, but so do billions of other businesses in the world. What makes this one special? Pupsbunch (talk) 21:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be Deleted - I do agree with you Pupsbunch, but I have created this page to provide unique information about this company. This company has many a things which are unique and should be known to people around the world. I am not saying that you keep this article merely because I have put my hard work in it, But for the unique services and products the company is offering. I have research a lot about the company and then decided to make a page for it. I do believe that there is nothing wrong create a page for a company who is a bit unique compared to other companies belonging to the same industry. Talking about the net-worthiness of the company, you must know that Unistal stands second amongst the pioneer in data recovery software and services after Stellar. I do believe that the not be deleted. EpicTraveler (talk) 12:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.