Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uniqly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uniqly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A company that does not meet the companies guideline or the general notability guideline due to a lack of coverage in independent sources. Sources I can find are either sponsored (NewsBTC, Herald, Bitcoinist), or advertorial (Cryptonews, Cointelegraph), with the rest being regurgitated press releases (Flaunt, Haute, Mid-day). Bringing this to AfD as I would expect objection to a proposed deletion, and not nominating for speedy deletion due to a lack of significance due to the sourcing available. Sdrqaz (talk) 12:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - crypto sites and churnalism are not up to scratch for WP:CORPDEPTH. This is just promotion - David Gerard (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is clearly not notable. Anton.bersh (talk) 09:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per David Gerard. I also can't find sources that satisfy both WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. The content of the article is also somewhat incomprehensible. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.