Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unication Co., Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unication Co., Ltd.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable company. I consider this an A7, but the delettion was decline by another editor. DGG ( talk ) 20:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I also strongly concur with A7 and G11, nothing at all for any minimal basic notability here, there's nothing surprisingly outstanding to suggest anything for Wikipedia at all. Fortunately we are now armed with G4 for the future, SwisterTwister talk 20:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I think this is in A7/G11 territory also. shoy (reactions) 15:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A firm going about its business but nothing in the article or found in my searches indicates notability. AllyD (talk) 06:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A company which produces pagers, but nothing particularly notable about it. I found an examiner.com review about one of its pagers (cannot link due to spam blacklist), but the company as a whole seems to have little to no coverage. Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH --Lemongirl942 (talk) 20:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.