Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UniKey (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UniKey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company was hardly notable in 2014 and has done nothing notable since. Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Can you give a bit more detail about why you think the sources that are already in the article don't establish notability? Mokadoshi (talk) 18:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The previous AfD was for a Canadian product rather than the Florida company which is the subject of the present one. AllyD (talk) 15:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Do I understand correctly that it should be on List of Shark Tank investments? IgelRM (talk) 22:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on current articles such as Techcrunch, Business Insider and Mashable. These are all reliable publications.Royal88888 (talk) 07:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a small blip, but a notable blip. Several good sources in the article, WP:THREE is met. Nominator needs to do more effort to justify the nom. BrigadierG (talk) 00:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.