Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undone (Tony Duggins album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Tossers. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undone (Tony Duggins album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find coverage of this album in reliable sources. [1] It does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Till 03:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There's a staff review at Punknews, so that appears to be reliable. There's also a paragraph in this Illinois Entertainer piece, but I'm not finding any other coverage. Gongshow ^Talk 17:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Tossers where it is already listed in the discography section. The case for a standalone article is weak here, and what we have is not really an article - people should be able to come up with more than just an infobox and tracklisting before they create album articles. --Michig (talk) 16:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above and WP:NOTROCKETSCIENCE. Lugnuts ^{And the horse} 08:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.