Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncyclopedia (10th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Try again on April Fools' Day. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Invalid^OS (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uncyclopedia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A defunct website that Wikipedia is not supposed to promote and make people new to knowing it miss being able to see when it existed. A very important note that's aimed at anyone who votes to keep the article because it survived 9 Afd's, please note that an important fact is that the site is now defunct. Georgia guy (talk) 15:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - are we really doing this again? Precedent says this article is to be kept despite it being defunct. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 16:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The fact that the site is defunct is not a valid reason for deletion. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely keep, as this is very notable on the Internet. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.