Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ummy Video Downloader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ummy Video Downloader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN software product, WP:PROMO, WP:ENN, doesn't meet WP:GNG, has been templated for months. Unsourced, because safety of the program per Norton is irrelevant. SPA's one and only edit. MSJapan (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Similarly can't find any coverage of the product in any major software publications. Avram (talk) 08:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ah, so they managed to sneak in this one. Technically not eligible for A7 but there is no credible claim of significance here. This is just one of the many "Youtube video downloaders". No reliable secondary sources exist for this. Also delete per WP:NOTPROMO. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. Mention in an antivirus software directory is not an indicator of notability. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.