Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UltraBac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UltraBac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP Mottezen (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This company probably is not notable enough for a stand-alone Wikipedia article, but their product (UltraBac) may be. I found one solid review in the InfoWorld magazine (19 August 1998, pp. 46D and 46L), but not much more, so I´m unable to rewrite the article. Pavlor (talk) 06:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • If a user finds more sources about this product and feels confident an article could be written about it that's not promotional and not a stub, I'd be happy to withdraw my nomination and rescope this article. But I'd have to see the sources first. Mottezen (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 04:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.