Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrike Reinhard (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ulrike Reinhard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't meet WP:BIO CelenaSkaggs (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Nominating all the German authors you can find is fine, but this one is notable, there sufficient sources for WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 14:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment She is certainly well-known for her skatepark. I've cleaned up the article a little and added the RS about the park. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The sources show she is recognized for her multimedia work and her enterprising skateboard part in India.--Ipigott (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 17:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. Note that nominator seems to have abandoned their account. —Kusma (t·c) 09:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.