Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulipur.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ulipur.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy was declined once. No credible claim of notability or importance. The references are relatively weak and fail to establish notability. A news portal in a small administrative unit below that of a district in rural Bangladesh. No coverage in reliable, independent sources, needed to establish notability. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 11:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 11:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 12:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ulipur.com is an online news portal of Kurigram district, Bangladesh. It is most popular and first govt verified online news site of Rangpur division. We know the name of ulipur (location) is a local but the news portal is much popular by viewers. The ulipur.com page has sufficient documents here. I hope include five references (Bengali & English also) are enough for now. Please help keep the page active and you can check all referrals link, also documents. Mr.RezaRahman (talk) 12:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.RezaRahman You didn't get the point. It's fails WP:GNG. There are more than 3-thousand newspapers verified by government in Bangladesh. but only 35 is passed WP:GNG. you can check the list here. ‍~ 𝕂𝕒𝕡𝕦𝕕𝕒𝕟 ℙ𝕒ş𝕒 ^{(inbox - contribs)} 19:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are more than 3-thousand verified newspapers/portals in Bangladesh, this is totally false information. You are enmity with us. You don't want to be verified by ulipur.com wikipedia. Moreover, this website is very popular and healthy web portal in this Divisional zone. Why are you doing this? Mr.RezaRahman (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.RezaRahman First of all, try to understand that proposal for deletion is not a personal attak. Secondly, The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting itself gave the account of 3220 newspapers, I did not. Third, this verification is not the same thing as meeting the terms of Wikipedia's notability policy. I want you to contribute more to Wikipedia and try to understand Wikipedia policies. I am not your opponent by any means. And if Ulipur.com meets any of these criteria, you can tell me; Maybe I can also contribute to improve this article. ‍~ 𝕂𝕒𝕡𝕦𝕕𝕒𝕟 ℙ𝕒ş𝕒 ^{(inbox - contribs)} 07:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect/merge to Ulipur Upazila as an ATD. Fails WP:GNG, non-notable website. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ‍~ 𝕂𝕒𝕡𝕦𝕕𝕒𝕟 ℙ𝕒ş𝕒 ^{(inbox - contribs)} 19:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ≈ MS Sakib «TalK» 20:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination.→ Tanbiruzzaman 💬 10:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomination.≈ Farhan «Talk» 07:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.