Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uday Sathe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uday Sathe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article of someone who fails WP:SOLDIER - receiving a 3rd level award for gallantry isn't enough Gbawden (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable. "Third highest Gallantry Award"; fails WP:Soldier and reads like a local trivial history piece.
Delete Bad PROMO. Sourcing not enough for GNG. Fails SOLDIER.Icewhiz (talk) 17:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Blatantly promotional attempt at writing a Wiki article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:Soldier. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Mid-ranking officer with a single third-level decoration. Clear fail of WP:SOLDIER. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.