Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uday Sahay (3rd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America1000 22:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uday Sahay

Uday Sahay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable retired police officer Uncletomwood (talk) 06:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appears to pass WP:GNG, plus his time in office, awards and other work since seem to show he is notable enough for an article. Mdann52 (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He's held mainly non notable posts. His awards are also not notable. Mind clarifying? Uncletomwood (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 03:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know - his notability is at best marginal and the article has a terrible problem with COI editors coming in to write about how marvellous he is. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist Music1201 talk 00:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 00:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.