Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UZURV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UZURV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The cited sources are all churnalism, just recycled press releases. No substantive independent coverage. Small private company, created by a likely paid editor and all substantive edits almost certainly by the company's PR. Guy (Help!) 19:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Written by now banned editor with undeclared COI.--Theredproject (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Routine coverage for startup. Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 21:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 22:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Churnalism & weak local news blurbs insufficient depth as said by nominator. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:43, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It would for sure fails the new WP:NCORP standard. scope_creep (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.