Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USA Freedom Kids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Freedom Kids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC. Only assertion of notability is performing at a Trump rally in January 2016. No repeat performances, no additional coverage. Oh, they sued Trump's campaign for allegedly not getting paid, yawn… Maybe give them a linge in Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 per WP:1E? — JFG ^talk 15:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC) — JFG ^talk 15:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per GNG. You can yawn all you want, but a search for "USA Freedom Kids" at Google yields more than 45,000 results, and sources are not all about the July rally performance. I actually think this could be a nice little Good article if we decide to expand the article instead of delete.

Sources:

I think there is plenty of coverage and vote to keep the article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there is sure plenty of coverage, but it's all linked to the campaign. Still WP:1EVENT in my book, may deserve a line or two in the campaign article or in Legal affairs of Donald Trump if the lawsuit gets some followup. (With all due respect to the girls, I actually saw them perform in one of those rally videos at the time, their notability comes only from this.) — JFG ^talk 21:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But not all coverage is about their rally performance. They've released an album and singles, been profiled and parodied, sued Trump, etc. They were also named one of 45 Americans Who Defined the Election. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• @Another Believer: Can you please bring examples of major media coverage beyond that campaign event. Thanks.E.M.Gregory (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I am adding refs to the article off ad on. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 05:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• weak keep this group did go viral during the campaign; it was a moment. I had forgotten them completely, maybe I never even noticed this at the time, but, clearly, they has a moment. plus the lawsuit (full disclosure: I actually know someone who runs a business Trump stiffed).E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per American Believer. —Мандичка^YO 😜 04:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Your reasoning is not quite right, but I am American so I'll play along... :p ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:GNG. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 17:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets notability requirements.LM2000 (talk) 04:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.