Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKTV Car of the Year 2007

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 15:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UKTV Car of the Year 2007

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can’t see anything notable about this Chidgk1 (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't even remember creating it!! Lol!! Delete it if needs be... JRRobinson (talk) 13:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced, non notable and author also supports deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 18:18, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, no substantive edits by other users. @JRRobinson:, you can tag this as {{db-g7}} and save us five days. Star Mississippi 14:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And in return, maybe you and your friends could remove the topic ban you unjustly put on me..., that would save everyone from poorly edited pages, which have been rife recently... JRRobinson (talk) 14:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
G7 doesn't apply as they aren't the only contributor. I don't agree that the 30 intermediate edits are small enough to warrant a G7, so we can just see out the AfD. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus was against lifting the topic ban @JRRobinson when it was just brought to a 3rd discussion. It has nothing to do with "friends" and I suggest you drop the stick or you're going to end up with a broader ban. @Lee Vilenski that's a surprising conclusion? This is the difference in content. Either way, apologies for giving you wrong information on that @JRRobinson Star Mississippi 15:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
G7 isn't really designed for an article history of 15 years. It shouldn't matter waiting a couple days. I'd recommend dropping the stick with your topic ban JRRobinson. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can that be consensus when only one side of the argument was heard...??? JRRobinson (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Utterly non-notable. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.