Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UBreakiFix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt. Temporarily in case it becomes notable after all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UBreakiFix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As stated by my extensive PROD, literally a blatant advertisement that has noticeably been touched and otherwise involved by the company itself, the expected amount of article-focused accounts and IPs and then nothing else actually suggesting both independent notability and substance, the links listed are all simply local PR and republished PR, triviality such as the Fortune link only mentioning them once because of a company action, so literally none of this actually suggests meaningful improvements and suggesting anything otherwise without actually acknowledging the PR advertising blatancy is damning ourselves as an encyclopedia. Considering this was speedy deleted once before in 2009 before actually being restarted by an advertising-only account last year, I suggest Salting to at least bar from repeated attempts as it shows it's still only advertising. Even today, an IP from the company's area changed the company information and there's nothing worse blatant than the past account "UBREAKIFIX CANADA". SwisterTwister talk 22:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Just commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete and salt per nom - David Gerard (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt and close this Afd. I commend the nom for taking this much effort to explain details in the nom statement. I might have not had the gumption to do so. No reason for this Afd to be listed any further. Lourdes 04:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.