Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TutorsWeb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TutorsWeb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, promo without evidence of notability - David Gerard (talk) 23:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Not notable. - JLOPO (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Source Review:
- India Times - A reliable source... except that at the bottom of the article they placed the following disclaimer: "(This story has not been edited by timesofindia.com and is auto–generated from a syndicated feed we subscribe to.)" Thank you for being honest India Times, this is why you are a reliable source. And this article is not.
- Start-Up Hyderabad - Exact same text from previous India Times source, above. Not RS. Not even really a different source.
- Business Standard - Exact same text as above sources. Not RS.
- Computerzhub - Obviously not a RS. Filled with ungrammatical advertisment-speak, reminiscent of email spam.
- "The Hindu" - No link available, but the title suggests it is a mere press release, not an in-depth article.

A google news search pops up site after site after site with the EXACT SAME TEXT. It's not impossible that SOMEWHERE in there is an actual article with coverage, since there are so many hits, but if there is, I can't find it. Delete. Fieari (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per Fieari. -- MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 01:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Seems to be a promo about the website with no notability. Fails WP:GNG & WP:WEB. And also per Fieari. Ayub407^talk 17:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.