Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tushar tyagi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam ^Sing! 20:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tushar tyagi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Certainly fails WP:DIRECTOR with no actual notable films as such. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Subject definitely doesn't meet the WP:GNG standard, but they may meet WP:DIRECTOR #4 -the person's work has won significant critical attention, -[1], [2], [3], [4]. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDAFD: Tushar Tyagi

Keep I agree with Anupmehra that he meets WP:DIRECTOR #4. Send it to cleanup to address IMDB sourcing, as his multiple mentions in numerous sources while not substantive, do show he and his works have received the media attention. See 1) "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability", and 2) "The person's work (or works) has won significant critical attention". And sorry, but I take issue with the nominator stating "no actual notable films as such", as this new director's films themselves not having Wikipedia articles is not a notability criteria... they may all end up as articles ONCE someone writes them. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -per WP:DIRECTOR #4. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Agree with Anupmehra Athachil (talk) 08:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.