Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuesday in Texas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn by Bridgeplayer. TJ Spyke 08:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tuesday in Texas

Fails WP:N. This event flopped and there are no secondary sources showing notability. Unless we are to argue that every televised 'sporting' event is notable, and of course there are plenty that aren't, this has to go - Delete. Bridgeplayer 23:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn now the article is sourced to meet WP:V Bridgeplayer 15:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strongest possible Keep This was a internationally broadcast PPV from the biggest wrestling organization of the world. Whether it was a "flop" or not is irrelevant. 23:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment - nothing in WP:N that I can see that makes 'internationally broadcast PPV' notable. What is needed are sources to meet WP:V attesting that out of the thousands of PPV events broadcast each year that this one is notable. So far, there are none. Bridgeplayer 23:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WWE (then WWF) only does a certain amount of PPVs a year, in this case 5 in 1991. Being a PPV from the largest wrestling company is notable enough. I can add more refs, but even without them it's notable. TJ Spyke 23:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest possible Keep I definitely agree with TJ Spyke. It was a very important WWF card in which the WWF Championship changed hands. This is more than just a televised event. ---- GIGGAS2 | Talk 00:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep A World Title change. ~~The first WWF PPV not on a Sunday.~~ As far as I'm aware, WWE PPVs are generally considered notable. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak_Sign 00:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Minor point, the first few Survivor Series PPV's were held on Thangksgiving day (Thursday). TJ Spyke 00:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They were? Ah well fair enough ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak_Sign

Strong Keep PPV from the largest sports-entertainment company in the world with its world title changing hands. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 00:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Regardless of how one feels about this sport, it is notable because of who produced it. JBEvans 00:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep per above.-- bulletproof ^3:16 00:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for reasons stated above. Yakuman (数え役満) 05:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it's notable just like the other WWE PPVs. MPJ-DK 06:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "This event flopped" is listed as a reason for nomination? Since when was that a wiki criteria?? MPJ-DK 06:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, well it's pretty obvious - it's a PPV. Davnel03 08:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the mind boggles that this was even nominted, PPV write-ups, championship lists and wrestler bios are the three main planks of this project, to remove this page would be lunacy. Darrenhusted 11:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the comments above, article now meets core content policies. RFerreira 06:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.