Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tube-Fruit, All Smiles and Chocolate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Modest Mouse discography#Cassettes. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tube-Fruit, All Smiles and Chocolate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical release. No evidence of charting. No evidence of awards. No evidence of full-length professional reviews. The best in the way of sources appears to be a picture, four lines of text and a track listing, all written by someone who was sent a free copy of the album. That's not in depth coverage by independent reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Modest_Mouse_discography#Cassettes - Considering the cassette only sold 100 copies, this is probably to blame for the lack of sources and, like most bands, they aren't very well-known at their first days or work. Google News and Books provided nothing and my own search found this blog. Although the album is not notable, it is significant to the Modest Mouse discography so a redirect would be the best option. SwisterTwister talk 20:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:20, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.