Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tu'i Tonga Fefine (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tu'i Tonga Fefine

Tu'i Tonga Fefine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a speedy renomination. My previous concern was: Verification search shows many sources, but it is ambiguous if they significantly cover the subject or if they are reliable at all.

Joe Decker was the only one to comment. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. *tips hat* --j⚛e deckertalk 01:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/redirect or keep From the small sniopet I can see [1] is reliable enough to suggest that there is some verifiability to the title, [2] verifies who abolished the title, and [3] looks like it's reliable and signficant coverage. There's enough there I expect it's notable, it might not be, either way, combined coverage might have some advantages, but I do think, from what is admittedly a short review, that the title at least warrants a redirect and a bit of content at the target. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 05:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 05:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 03:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.