Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ttakji

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♠ 05:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ttakji

Ttakji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication what this actually is, or why it is notable. CxHy (talk) 02:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But I think that ttakji is notable in South Korea--CxHy (talk) 02:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)--CxHy (talk) 02:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- ttakji is notable games in South Korea. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 01:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- ttakji is notable game in South Korea. -- 낙동혁명 (talk) 08:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Mentioned here: Pogs#South_Korea. I added two citations there and an alternative spelling. In the other citation it says the game originated from Japan in the 19th century. This is probably according to some Korean information not stated in that book. Since Menko is mentioned right above in the pog article, it's logical to assume it to have been the ancestor. The instruments are quite different though, with menko played with actual cards. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete instead and & userfy as this contains nothing convincing of a better article. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 02:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.