Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Leaf Market

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was IAR Close‎. I'm not going to relist a tained nomination. Any established editor is welcome to bring this back to AfD if they feel there's merit. Star Mississippi 02:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True Leaf Market

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional, paid-for-spam. Fails WP:NCORP. Fhektii (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Utah. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Brief mentions in articles in RS, but nothing about this enterprise found. PROMO and not meeting notability for companies. Oaktree b (talk) 16:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Comment This is one of a series of deletions started by a brand new account that has now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See [1]. Not sure if a procedural close is in order. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, since someone supported deletion. Queen of Hearts talk
she/they
stalk 00:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree b. WP:CORPDEPTH is not met. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC) - — 84.146.2.66 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.