Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivection oven
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy/snow keep. Non-admin closure. Jamie☆S93 23:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Trivection oven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not a real cooking device, just a plot element from a sitcom. non-notable outwith the episode itself. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Another user accidentally tacked an improperly formatted listing onto the top of this one. Since the improper listing should have been at WP:CFD anyway, I've removed it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to be a real product, sourcing looks adequate for what it asserts, unless I'm missing something, and there's potential for future expansion. Jclemens (talk) 18:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Again, seems to be real, and national advertising + mention on a sitcom (even if it's backhanded product placement) provide notability IMO. umrguy42 18:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Does not seems to be notable enough for own article. SYSS Mouse (talk) 18:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into what article? Jclemens (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, real product that won awards well before the sitcom appearance (for instance). It's a high-end product that shows up in luxury home publications or cooking shows and should be able to have improved sourcing. --Dhartung | Talk 20:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs improvement to be more focused on the product, but seems to be real enough. Maxamegalon2000 15:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep -- nominator didn't look, just guessed since it was mentioned on TV it was fake. It took a long time to check to see if this was a real oven, Chris Cunningham. I did a google search and the first link returned was to the GE appliances web site about the oven.[1] Oh, and you can cook a Thanksgiving turkey in one in about 20 minutes. I did. --Blechnic (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per secondary sources. –thedemonhog talk • edits 22:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Strongly advise that nominator be more careful in making nominations - the claim that this oven is not a real product was trivial to avoid, and suggests gross negligence in nominating. Phil Sandifer (talk) 05:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.