Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triplex Confinium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Triplex Confinium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable research project. No claim of notability, no 3rd-party sources, independent coverage insufficient to meet WP:GNG. GregorB (talk) 10:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Some of this content was probably taken from a website about the project and I wouldn't be surprised if some of the editors involved were also in the university project. While I think the subject matter is important, this article looks like advertisement of academic work, not an encyclopedic article on the subject. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find any secondary sources to establish notability. This seems to be a puff piece at best. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Whatever those sources in the bibliography contain might help, but that would require someone who worked on the article in the first place to know, most likely. It'd still be one source, but could lead to a better reference. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 18:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commnet -- This seems to be a series academic research project, with multiple university participants that operated from the late 1990s to 2004. I can find nothing on the project website (even in Croatian - translated) much less than 10 years old. This suggests a project that was finished with a publication and was then wound up. If so, the article should be on the publication or its content. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.