Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribby Mountain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tribby Mountain

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short mountain that lacks sigcov and isn't distinguished in any way, failing WP:geoland and WP:gng, also per this and this precedent. Geschichte (talk) 23:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precedent is not a correct way to build an encyclopaedia. Notability is not a blanket. One has to look at each subject on its merits. Uncle G (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don’t see a proper WP:BEFORE, so I don’t see a good reasoning. SportsOlympic (talk) 18:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominators are NOT required to explicity spell out "I did a google search and a bing search and a yahoo search and a library of congress search and found only X, Y, and Z, which are not adequate." Stating that the subject does not meet our requirements is a good reasoning. If you have nothing useful to contribute here, such as your own sources that would pass GNG and GEOLAND as the nominator pointed out, then go away rather than make useless bad-faith accusations. Reywas92^Talk 23:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero mentions in newspapers.com, zero search results of substance, just mirrors and map labels. No indication there is any significant coverage of the small hill of this mass-produced page. Reywas92^Talk 23:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.