Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transportation emissions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transportation emissions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a page of total bollocks and, as far as I can see, is irredeemable. The first sentence is wrong: "Transportation emissions are gases released into the air that come from fossil fuels." So, burning coal in the home is a transportation emission? And it goes on the same: "The gases emit CO2": no they don't, the gases don't emit anything. etc etc. The image used to illustrate has absolutely nothing to do with transportation! The article is written in a "you can do this" attitude - hardly encyclopaedic. It contains a very long list of See also links which seem to be largely random (Stench !). This seems, at best, a rough draft for a schoolkid's homework. I have frequently argued in AfD that a poorly written aricle is not grounds for deletion but a spur to improvement. In this case, I make an exception since there is nothing to salvage or merge to other places. Emeraude (talk) 09:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Everything is already covered in other pages. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 15:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete false info including original research. LibStar (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:TNT, and quickly. Frigid Ninja 22:27, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is substantive info here, some good ref.'s and an overall structure for a decent page. Poorly written perhaps, but not irredeemable. First sentence only has a comma wrong. I don't see where it says "The gases emit CO2". Could use the tag: Fredwerner (talk) 11:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It has been edited since I made my comment. Look at a previous version from History. Emeraude (talk) 12:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.