Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trading Partner Identification Number

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No need for third relist; sourcing found and no rebuttals. (non-admin closure) J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 06:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trading Partner Identification Number

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, deprodded without comment, no sourcing found Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added some sourcing - and there is ample more sourcing. We have Taxpayer Identification Number (and the more notable Social Security number) - no reason not to have TPIN (save the OSE - mentioning to show we have other similar numeric id codes) - it is a valid lookup - which is important for anyone who is a US government contractor for the past couple of decades.06:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per sourcing added by Icewhiz ~Kvng (talk) 15:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.