Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TradeSports
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
TradeSports
No real assertion of notability. Unless notability shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 06:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 12:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes WP:WEB following a Lexis-Nexis search.
Examples of sources to come...Sources whose primary subject is Tradesports added to references section. Pan Dan 15:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Keep in light of sourcing by User:Pan Dan. — TKD::Talk 23:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. 2005 03:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User:Pan Dan. Englishrose 13:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Wikipedia: Notability (companies and corporations) states: "A company or corporation is notable if it meets any of the following criteria: ... The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." References section as edited by Pan Dan indicates some of those sources. Recommend that Nlu withdraw the nomination, per Wikipedia:Speedy keep. Thesmothete 04:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the comments above and recent sourcing. RFerreira 01:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.