Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trí Phải

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Even though the discussion has almost run for a full 7 days, the deletion rationale contradicts common sense with respect to WP:NGEO so heavily that no other reasonable editor would recommend deleting the article on this ground. (non-admin closure) Juliette Han (talk) 10:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trí Phải (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references provided. The article doesn't have stats beyond basic information. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:GNG --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:27, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close - invalid deletion rationale..† Encyclopædius 15:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:GNG. Happy now? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:27, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't fail GNG though (and it is verifiable). Read Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)...† Encyclopædius 15:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Check w:vi:Trí Phải. This is a significant settlement with a population of 12,970 as of 2005. Passes WP:NGEO. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Passes WP:NGEO. No compliance with WP:Before. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Subject passes WP:GEOLAND#1 Populated legally recognized place. Lightburst (talk) 23:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow keep a legally recognized populated place with a population of over 10,000 -- this is a slam-dunk WP:GEOLAND pass. No reason for this to linger here for 7 days. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 09:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep - Even before Encyclopædius added references this would've been a speedy keep. Verified population center easily passing WP:GEOLAND.Oakshade (talk) 19:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clear pass of WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.