Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Ultraelectromagneticpop!. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toyang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article tagged as unreferenced since 2011. GNews, GNews Archives and GSearch did not yield reliable references. Do note that you might get false positive due to the typhoons named Toyang. Alternatively, Redirect to its parent album Ultraelectromagneticpop! --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Philippines. Lenticel ^(talk) 05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ultraelectromagneticpop!: Found some brief coverage in these three articles, but that would probably only make it mergeworthy at best, assuming what's in there is even useful. Otherwise, I saw nothing but passing mentions. Some claimed the song was a hit but without any specific data to back it up, and per WP:CHARTS we don't have a reliable singles chart for when that would've been so we can't exactly confirm that ourselves. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ultraelectromagneticpop!: Per @QuietHere. No significant coverage available for a standalone article. @T.C.G. [talk] 19:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.