Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touch the Truck
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (partial speedy, per clear consensus, NAC). TheAE talk/sign 05:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Touch the Truck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Common publicity stunt. The fact that it received publicity isn't notable. Rklawton (talk) 12:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – against better judgment :-). As pointed out by nominator, it is an extremely common publicity stunt/fundraiser. As such, does not that in and of itself qualify it as Notable ? ShoesssS Talk 12:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not much in the article, and focuses on a specific contest. It is not about the more general stunt of "being-last-to-touch-the car-and therefore-win-it"ROxBo (talk) 13:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - article is not about a generic publicity stunt but rather a TV show which was broadcast nationally in the UK. Programmes broadcast on national channels/networks are usually considered notable. Coverage in major national newspapers included this, this and this, and here is something from a book..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy close - keep - I didn't realize this article was about a TV series (a bit of re-wording would help). It looked more like a one-shot publicity stunt. Rklawton (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - We can't do a speedy keep based on a nominator's withdraw since someone else has recommended deletion. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep per above. Ikip (talk) 17:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is sourced and the reason for deletion is not longer valid. --Jmundo 18:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.