Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Miner

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2018 January 11.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Minecraft#Cultural impact. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Total Miner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There don't seem to be any sources that mention it as the subject of an article, such that it passes WP:GNG. All mentions that I have found appear to be incidental or not from a reliable source. Created by a WP:SPA._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. Search results from GNEWS turned out nothing. Zazzysa (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Game has not generated enough reliable third-party sources to establish notability.TH1980 (talk) 23:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably deserves a mention in Minecraft (and indeed, it has one), given XBLA top 2011 top indie list, comparison to Minecraft, comparison to Minecraft, and XBLA top 2012 top indie list. If you want, delete and redirect to Minecraft#Cultural impact or Minecraft#Clones (probably the former), else a simple redirect will do. --Izno (talk) 04:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete and redirect to Minecraft#Cultural impact otherwise not enough reliable third-party sources to establish notability. --ClrView (talk) 08:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Minecraft #Cultural impact per previous users. ~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 21:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.