Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TorrentProject

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 12:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TorrentProject

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable bit torrent search engine. Fails WP:WEBCRIT for lack of available reliable sources independent of the subject. Most sources merely mention the subject. - Mr X 15:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 16:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 16:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Torrent Project being mentioned by multiple independent sources is enough to establish notability. --Frmorrison (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing better but I'm willing to change if the consensus changes as well. SwisterTwister talk 01:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since it is Alexa rank 51,575 and is just one of many torrent sites. rayukk | talk 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since it's Alexa rank is 4,839 not 51,575 (I updated the page with new information and sources), also the search engine offering free api and mentioned by multiple independent sources.BooBooSweet (talk) 14:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:WEBCRIT.—UY Scuti ^Talk 15:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't have enough significant independent coverage to show notability. As has been pointed out, fails WP:WEBCRIT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.