Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toppr (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| [squeal] || 07:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toppr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Generic online learning company. scope_creep^Talk 09:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. XOR'easter (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - routine coverage, notability not established. 1292simon (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Per the below table, Reliable, Significant, and Independent coverage exists in WP:RS to show both WP:GNG and WP:NCORP coverage. Tags should be added on the article page to provide targeted feedback to improve article quality, rather than rush to an AFD. Ktin (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Review of the references in the article:

[12] Topping the Growth. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Not independent.

[13] Fails WP:CORPDEPTH standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as: of changes in share or bond prices

Same as the previous one.

[14] Ed-tech firm Toppr raises Rs 350 crore in series D funding. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH of a capital transaction, such as raised capital

[15] Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Standard notices

[16] WP:CORPDEPTH of the expansions, acquisitions, mergers, sale, or closure of the business,

[17] Advert. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:PROMO

These are the first seven references. The other references in the article are low-quality junk refs that fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 07:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Looking at the WP:REFBOMB that the previous editor has posted:

[18] Press-release. Also fails WP:CORPDEPTH of a product or a product line launch, sale, change, or discontinuance

[19] Press-release. Also fails WP:CORPDEPTH of a capital transaction, such as raised capital

[20] Also the same. Monies raised.

[21] Monies raised. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.

[22] Press release.

[23] Techcrunch. Lowest-quality ref possible. Non-RS. Deprecated.

[24] fails WP:CORPDEPTH of a capital transaction, such as raised capital

I'm not going to do anymore, as assuming WP:AGF they are all non-notable. A mix of press-release, adverts, standard notices, monies raised, capital transactions and share price changes that fail WP:NOT, WP:NOTADVERTISING, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 07:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.