Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Mcgrath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Mcgrath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Sources in the article are not significant coverage, and the Google search results (e.g., The Guardian) are for other people with the same name. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:NPOL. Ingratis (talk) 12:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Local authority councillors are not deemed "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles, but rather get to have articles only if they can be shown to pass WP:NPOL #2 on the back of far, far more substance and sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.