Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tones and I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Not a copyvio. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 21:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tones and I

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Mediati74 (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC) The article is a copyright violation. Mediati74 (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mediati74, copyright violation isn't usually a reason to completely delete a page from Wikipedia. Please could you provide some evidence for your allegation, and also explain in more detail, with reference to Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musicians, why you think this demonstrates that the page should be deleted? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep The nom needs to elaborate and point out what is a copyvio, but the subject is an obvious charting singer, no doubt. Nate • (chatter) 21:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Per speedy keep criteria #1 and #3. Is a charting singer, clearly establishing notability, and Earwigs suggests the only reason for copyvio is some quoting from the interview. No valid rationale for deletion is advanced. Best, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Violation possible" according to Earwig's Copyvio Detector, here relates to two quotes from a Triple J article. The source is properly acknowledged in this article by use of a suitable reference template. There is no copyvio here.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.