Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Together for Trees
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Together for Trees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable initiative. Merge with Tesco. Oliver Virk (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on a 2012 campaign for Tesco Clubcard points to be donated to their joint initiative with RSPB. There was some at-launch PR coverage but the Tesco subsite is no longer available, and I am not seeing sustained coverage. (There is more sustained coverage for a similarly-named but distinct later initiative by Yorkshire Dales Millennium Trust.) AllyD (talk) 09:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.