Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toe Shot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toe Shot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm no expert on computer gaming terms, but this appears to be a non-notable neologism, possibly coined by the article creator. I can't find any ghits with this meaning of the phrase, and there are no sources quoted. Anaxial (talk) 20:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 22:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is a raging lack of notability for this newly made up term. Reso lute 22:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It seems pretty obvious from reading the article that the term was created by either the article's author or someone the author knows personally. Some research finds no coverage of the term in reliable sources. It looks like an obvious protologism to me. Tim meh (review me) 23:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a little bit of a vanity article, methinks. Marasmusine (talk) 09:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Super-Strong Delete - fails WP:N and WP:RS, plus it may be WP:OR --Teancum (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.