Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby Hull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. NA1K has proven the BLP is notable enough to warrant an article and that NOTINHERITED doesn't really apply .... (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Hull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete: as non-notable individual/performer. Quis separabit? 02:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - having one's own series on the largest of the UK's three nationwide commercial terrestrial networks (CITV is ITV's equivalent of CBBC) does, I think, satisfy the notability requirements of WP:Entertainer . Plutonium27 (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree: No significant multiple roles/fan base/innovation, so doesn't meet WP:Entertainer.--A bit iffy (talk) 12:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect, either to Emu (puppet) or to Rod Hull#Legacy. The subject's notability is effectively inherited from his performances with the puppet after his father's death, but a search term redirected to either the puppet or the father is certainly justified. PWilkinson (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect as a compromise as there's nothing to suggest a better notable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to either puppet's article or father's article (unsure which). The Guardian and Mail articles are on the slight side, and just introduce him (i.e. they aren't reviews or anything).--A bit iffy (talk) 12:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. It was his fathers act so that's the redirect location. Szzuk (talk) 17:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC, and the coverage below is largely based upon the subject's own performances. Source examples include, but are not limited to: ^[1], ^[2], ^[3], ^[4], ^[5]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.